Rape Culture and
the Drunken Whore Fallacy
By
Jen McClendon
Introduction:
I will be writing a series of articles that address one or
more of the components of rape and abuse culture. In this article I will
address the issue of alcohol. The alcohol fallacy is nicely expressed here in a
Washington Post Op Ed. http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/alcohol-abuse-is-fueling-military-sexual-assault/2013/06/13/da2f5ada-d37c-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html
Rape culture is a term that is thrown
around often enough that most of us think that we know what it is. What is rape
culture? Does “Rape culture” promote rape or merely condone it? What is the
source of rape culture? How do we learn not to promote rape? I will take
several months to effectively and holistically address a global Meta CBT about
rape and violence. We need to go here if our daughters and sons are to live
more safely than we did.
We start learning not to promote
rape with a broad but inclusive definition of rape culture. We offer examples
of rape culture and then we make proposals for sustainable change. In other
words, we have to think about what we think about rape. Then we have to
challenge those thinking patterns on a macro level. Think of this as Meta CBT
or Meta Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Think, identify, challenge, and actively change.
Then sustain that change with practice.
Let us distill this through the
alcohol fallacy. If we can blame alcohol for rape than we do not have to blame
rapists. If we continue to blame alcohol for rape than military commands,
police divisions, businesses, churches, fraternities, parents, and college
campuses do not have to address the problem of rape culture. This social
problem should be called what it is and that is letting everyone off the hook
but the victim.
Prima Fascia the alcohol fallacy is
a seemingly plausible explanation but it falls short of being a comprehensive approach.
I would ask whether rape statistics receded during prohibition but rape data
was not systemically collected and people drank during prohibition. The global “We” have a long way to go and much
learning ahead of us on this matter.
We call arguments like the alcohol
fallacy half-truths in logic and debate. Alcohol is often present and a person
that is drinking is less capable to defend himself or herself against the
rapist. In all cases the absence of a rapist leads to the absence of a rape. The
absence of alcohol and the presence of a rapist do not guarantee that a rape
will be avoided. Nevertheless, many commentators on rape place an absurd
emphasis on alcohol, which deflects blame from the attacker. See the June 13th
2013 Op Ed in the Washington Post by Lt. Colonel Elizabeth Robins. Thank you
for your service Colonel Robins.
Here is a chart
Alcohol + rapist =probable rape
|
No alcohol + rapist = possible rape
|
Alcohol + no rapist = No rape
|
© Jen McClendon 2013
Alcohol is not the common denominator here.
There is an active tendency to
allow more bad behavior from men than women. This is the boys will be boys
fallacy. We have all heard that boys will be boys. Men are allowed to get drunk
and go brawling. If a man commits an act of rape while he is drinking many
people think of that man as a victim of his own drinking. Many people describe
drunken rape in terms of “Accidental rape”. Perhaps he would not have raped
someone if he were not drunk. We would not let a drunk driver off this easily.
If a woman is drunk while being relentlessly
violated then she should have been more responsible and she should not have
been drunk enough to “Get herself raped.” We want women to be responsible and
proper while men do as they wish. Just to recap, a man is not at fault if he is
drunk and commits rape but if a woman is drunk then she failed to keep herself
safe. A significant degree of cognitive dissonance is necessary to cling to
this double standard.
What rape survivors call the “Drunken
whore fallacy” is alive and well in discourse on rape. This is not different
than the Saudi woman that was sentenced to 200 lashes for being raped. The only
component that is absent is the post assault physical abuse. The post assault
psychological abuse is part of the main course in the treatment of the American
rape victim. The case against the midshipman that was raped at the United
States Naval Academy illuminates this double standard. A rape victim is being
punished in order to exonerate her attackers.
The case should be against her
attackers but whether or not she was drunk has taken center stage. There is a very well written article in the
September 7, 2013 Washington Post local blog about the Naval Academy trial and
what it tells us about culture at America’s Naval Academy.
Would what is happening to this
Naval Midshipman be acceptable if this were your daughter? Our current approach
will not suffice for my children. I will not subject another person’s child to
something that I will shield my own children from experiencing. We have to do
this Meta CBT.
Inequality is the foundational
philosophy of rape culture. Red herrings
and the half-truths that we tell ourselves lay at the heart of rape culture. Holistic
and comprehensive facts lay the foundation for solving this problem. The whole
population needs to think about what we think and determine whether our
opinions about rape are exportable to other situations. We need to ask if we
would participate in the excuses that promote rape today if they were used by
parents that rape their children. What if the child was taking cold medicine? If
a drunk woman is walking home and a drunk man is driving home and the drunk man
hits the drunk woman with his car, is she guilty of getting herself struck?
What do we think about what we
think?
This is the first in a long series
of articles that will attack the fallacies that promote rape culture. If we are
to undermine rape culture then we have to talk about everything that it is and
not just throw around the term.
No comments:
Post a Comment